Petition for Substitution of Arbitrator upon Termination of Mandate [CD1]
In the High Court at Calcutta Ordinary
Original Civil Jurisdiction
Special Suit No........... of..............
In the High Court at Calcutta Ordinary
Original Civil Jurisdiction
In the matter of Arbitration and
Conciliation Act 1996
And
In the matter of an application under
section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996
And
Builders India Private Ltd., a company
registered under the Companies Act 1956 and carrying on business at 7A, Camac
Street, Calcutta 700 016
Petitioner
versus
S.N. Udyog Private Ltd., a company
registered under the Companies Act
1956 and carrying on business at 6 S.P. Mukherjee Road, Mumbai 700 025
Respondent
To
The
Hon'ble Mr..................
Chief
Justice and His Companion
Justices
of
the
said Hon'ble Court
The
humble petition of Builders India Private Ltd., the petitioner above-named,
most respectfully.
SHEWETH:
1. By and under an agreement dated the petitioner undertook to construct
houses, flats and guest-houses, for the first respondent on agreed
specifications, terms and conditions and price.
2. Your petitioner completed the work,
obtained payment of the running bills, offered delivery of houses, flats and
guest-houses and claimed payment of the final bill.
3. The first respondent raised various
minor objections with a view to withhold payment of the outstanding bills.
4. Disputes and differences arose in
relation to the said agreement. The said agreement contained an arbitration
clause. According to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Anil Chaudhury was
appointed as the sole arbitrator in respect of the matters in dispute between
the parties.
5. The said arbitrator failed to enter
into reference in spite of requests.
6. On application being made by the
petitioner in this Hon'ble Court the said arbitrator was removed by an Order
dated and respondent No. 2 was
appointed in place and stead of Mr. Anil Chaudhury.
7. The disputes between the parties
concerned fraud and forgery of the documents which form the foundation of the
claims and contentions of the parties.
8. Your petitioner states that such
disputes involved complicated questions of Criminal Law and detailed evidence
to be taken including opinion from experts for that purpose and several
witnesses have to be summoned, which could not be appropriately done and the
matter
9. adjudicated upon by the present
arbitrator. In the premises, it will be more appropriate and convenient that
his mandate be terminated.
10.The present arbitrator appointed by
the said order removing the earlier arbitrator is a non- legal person and he
will not be able to adjudicate the present disputes between the parties which
involves complicated questions of forgery of documents and fraud a new
arbitrator be appointed interims of sub-section (2) of section 15 of the Act.
11.Unless orders are made as prayed for
herein your petitioner will suffer loss and prejudice.
12.This application is made bona fide and
in the interest of justice.
Your
petitioner therefore humbly prays Your Lordships for the following orders:
a. Terminate the mandate of the present
arbitrator;
b. Appoint by substitution a new and
competent arbitrator in terms of section 15(2) of the Act;
c. Costs of this application be the costs
in the court proceedings;
d. Further Orders be made and directions
be given as to this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
e. And your petitioner as in duty bound
shall ever pray.
Signature of the Advocate Signature
of the petitioner
for the petitioner
Verification
I,
............................son of.............. aged years by occupation service, working for gain at 7A, Camac Street,
Calcutta 700 016 do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:
I
am the Manager of Builders India Private Ltd., and its Principal Officer and
Constituted Attorney. I know and I have made myself acquainted with the facts
and circumstances of this case and I am able to depose thereto. I am authorised
and competent to verify the aforesaid petition and I do verify the same on
behalf of
the
petitioner.
The
statements contained in paragraphs 1 to 13 hereinabove are true to my knowledge
based on information derived from records maintained by the petitioner company
and I believe them to be true.
Solemnly
affirmed by the said Mr ............... pursuant to Board Resolution dated of the Builders India Private Ltd. in the
Court House at Calcutta on the 15th day of December 1999.
Before
me Commissoner
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.