IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT
JUDGE.......
Civil Appeal
No. ................... of 19........
C.D………………………………... Defendant/Appellant
versus
C.F…………………….................
Plaintiff/Respondent
GROUNDS OF APPEAL
The above named appellant files the appeal
under section 96 C.P.C. against the decree dated ......... ... of
.................... Addl. Civil Judge ............... original Suit No.........
.... of 19 ......
....... V. .................... and
sets forth the following grounds of appeal which is valued at Rs. ..........
1. Because the plaintiff failed to
prove his readyness and willingness to have the sale deed executed within time.
The view of the court below to the contrary is wrong.
2. Because it has been fully
established on record that it was the plaintiff who committed the breach and
not the defendant. The view of the court below to the contrary is erroneous.
3. Because no notice was served on the
defendant by the plaintiff before the period fixed for the execution of the
sale-deed. The finding of the court the contrary is incorrect.
4. Because both parties having entered
into evidence regarding the sa of notice the question of raising presumption of
due service under section 114 the Evidence Act did not arise. The view of the
court below to the contrary is incorrect.
5. Because it has been fully proved
that the evidence of the not worth relying in face of statement of ... rejected
the statement of ............... on absolutely untenable grounds.
6. Because the court below has
misconstrued the legal position at wrong
conclusions.
7. Because from the agreement the
intention of the parties are clear that they wanted to pay and receive damages
in case of breach y either of them and that is why an equal sum was mentioned
in the agreement. The view of the court below that it was in personum is not
justified.
8. Because the rulings cited upon by
the court below are the facts of the case and are distinguishable.
9. Because the suit for specific
performance of the contract in any case has been wrongly decreed. The plaintiff
was not legally entitled to enforce the agreement.
10.
Because the plaintiff has been disentitled to claim specific of the contract by
claiming damages for the breach. The court below did this aspect of the case.
11.
Because the judgment of the court below is bad in law ar deserves to be set
aside.
It is, therefore, prayed that the
appeal be allowed with costs, and the suit the plaintiff be dismissed with
costs.
Counsel for Appellant
[CD1]FORM OF FIRST APPEAL.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.