APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 4 CPC FOR DISCHARGE OR VARIATION OF INTERIM INJUNCTION ORDER. [CD1]
IN
THE COURT OF....................
AB....................................................................
Plaintiff
versus
CD...............................................................
Defendant.
APPLICATION UNDER
ORDER XXXIX RULE 4, C. P. C. FOR DISCHARGE OR VARIATION
OF INTERIM INJUNCTION ORDER
Sir,
That the defendant abovenamed
most respectfully submits as under:
1.
That the plaintiff has obtained an interim
injunction as to maintain status quo till
the disposal of the suit on.................... by making and presenting a
forged and fabricated agreement to sell the property in suit for
Rs..................:.. and showing the false receipt of
Rs..................... from the defendant in respect of the aforesaid false
and fabricated transaction. The plaintiff has made a false and forged thumb
impression of the defendant on the aforesaid agreement-deed which is dated
..................... The thumb impressions on the said deed of agreement are
not the thumb impressions of the defendant but of some other person who might have
connived with the plaintiff along with the witnesses thereto. Moreover the
plaintiff has expressly defamed the defendant by calling her a cunning lady in
the plaint.
2.
That the plaintiff has not so far paid proper
court fees on the plaint and has gone in revision before the learned District
Judge, simply to harass the defendant and to delay the disposal of the suit and
to bring the defendant, an old lady to natural death in gross abuse of the
process of law.
3.
That the defendant wants to dispose of the property
in suit for the proper settlement of the consideration between her legal heirs
and successors and for the maintenance of herself, and it is expedient in the
interest of justice that the defendant may be allowed to transfer the property
in suit pendentelite subject to the conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem
fit to impose.
4.
That the defendant undertakes that she will put
an express condition in the transfer deed to the willing transferee, binding
such transferee to abide by the decree and orders of this Hon’ble Court in the
suit and to disclaim all rights and title thereto on the final decree of this
Court if it goes against the defendant and the willing transferee.
5.
That in the circumstances aforesaid it is
further expedient that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to make a variation in
the interim injunction dated.................... allowing the defendant to
transfer the property in suit to some willing transferee or transferees subject
to the conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit.
PRAYER
It is therefore most respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to discharge the interim
injunction or to make a variation in the interim injunction
dated.................... allowing the defendant to transfer the property in
suit by sale to any willing persons purchasers subject to the conditions as
this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
Advocate
for defendant.
Place:....................
Dated:.................... 200
IN THE COURT
OF....................
Suit No..................... /200
In the Matter of:
AB..................................................
Plaintiff/Petitioner
versus
CD............................................
Defendant/Respondent
AFFIDAVIT [CD2]
I............................................................
resident of........... ......... do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as
under: -
1.
That I am
the........................................ in this case and hence competent to
swear this affidavit.
2.
That the contents of the accompanying
application are true and correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at....................
on this.................... day of.................... that the contents of the
above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge.
DEPONENT.
UNDUE HARDSHIP CAN BE GROUND FOR VARIATION
OF ORDER FOR INJUNCTION
Undue hardship can be a ground
for variation of an order for injunction under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Civil
Procedure Code.1
ARREST BEFORE JUDGEMENT OF DEFENDANT
Order 38, Rule 1
An
order of arrest before judgement of defendant is to be passed only where the
plaintiff is able to make out a prima
facie case and on being satisfied of the ingredients with regard to
possible abscondance or disposal of the properties with intent to delay or
obstruct the execution of the prospective decree. Merely because the defendant
appears before the Court the relief to the plaintiff cannot be denied.2
ORDER PASSED UNDER ORDER 38 RULE 1 CPC NOT
APPEALABLE
It is
evident from Rule 1(2) of Order 43 that an order passed under Order 38, Rule 1
is not appealable in nature though an order under Rule 2 which is to be passed
after the defendant is brought before the Court and where he fails to furnish
security is appealable.3
1. Parmanaand
Agarwal v. Sudera Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., 2000 (1) CCC 503 (Cal.
).
2.
S. Selvarathinam v. Rajasekharan Nair, AIR 2001
Kerala 1.
3.
S. Selvarathinam v. Rajasekharan Nair, AIR 2001
Kerala 1.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.