HC Reply Writ against Tribunal Judgement

 

HC Reply Writ against Tribunal Judgement 

 

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF TN AT CHENNAI

 

CWP No.: _____

Petitioner 

Versus

Respondents 

Reply on behalf of the respondent No. _____________________ to the Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

Respectfully Sheweth: 

Preliminary Submissions/Objections: 

1. That no fundamental or constitutional right whatsoever of the petitioner has been infringed and as such the writ petition is not maintainable.__________________________ ______ 

2. That the Writ Petition is not maintainable and the petitioner has no locus stand to file the Writ Petition. _____ ______________________________________________________

Reply on Merits 

1. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are not denied to the extent that the petitioner is a citizen of India. However, it is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to file or maintain this writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. __ ______________________________

2. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

3. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

4. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

5. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

6. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

7. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

8. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

9. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

10. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

11. That the contents of this para of the Writ Petition are wrong and denied. __ 

12. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the writ petition is lacking of material substance and is false, frivolous and vexatious and this writ petition deserves to be dismissed and may be dismissed in the interest of justice with costs. 

 

Chennai 

Replying Respondent No._____ ______ 

 

Through, Advocate 

 

 

BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF TN AT CHENNAI

 

CWP No.: ______

Petitioner 

Versus

Respondents 

Affidavit in support of reply on behalf of the replying respondent No. _____________to the Writ Petition

I,____________________________________, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:- 

1. That the accompanying reply has been drafted under my instructions. 

2. That the contents of paras 1 to _____ of preliminary submissions and paras 1 to _____ of the reply on merits are correct and true to the best of my knowledge and contents of paras _____ to ______ are correct as per the legal advice. 

3. That I further solemnly affirm and declare that this affidavit of mine is correct and true, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein. 

Affirmed here at  Chennai  this ______. 

Deponent